结论 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11Galaxy Tab S11 在许多方面都不负其高端平板电脑的美誉。它的制造质量一流，OLED 屏幕非常明亮，扬声器对于一款小巧的设备来说也非常出色。Galaxy Tab S11 与其他中国竞争对手不同，它能很好地满足任何人在购买平板电脑时对透明度和可持续性的要求。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
尽管 Dimensity 9400+ 没有设定任何性能基准，但我们几乎找不到可以批评该芯片组的地方。三星平板电脑在负载情况下相对较高的节流行为理所当然地受到了更多批评。
Galaxy Tab S11 的电池续航时间和 OLED 面板的色彩校准，再加上 One UI 8 界面缺乏定制选项，都让人有些失望。指纹传感器在日常使用中也不太理想。
Pros+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 大功率扬声器
+ 防水外壳
+ 频繁更新
+ 包含 S Pen
+ 快速 SoCCons- 色彩还原能力较弱
- 电池续航能力一般
- 指纹传感器速度稍慢
- 高节流
- 仅 UFS 3.1（128GB）
- 无 WiFi 7
价格和供货情况 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11Galaxy Tab S11 有六种型号，最大 UFS 存储容量为 512 GB，内存为 12 GB。Wi-Fi 版起价 799 美元，可直接从制造商或亚马逊网站购买。
$859.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 GB WiFi Android Tablet, Large Display, Durable, Slim, Light, High Performance, Long Battery Life, S Pen for Note-Taking, AI Assist, US Version, Gray$799.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 128 GB WiFi Android Tablet, Large Display, Durable, Slim, Light, High Performance, Long Battery Life, S Pen for Note-Taking, AI Assist, US Version, Gray$859.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 GB WiFi Android Tablet, Large Display, Durable, Slim, Light, High Performance, Long Battery Life, S Pen for Note-Taking, AI Assist, US Version, Silver
Table of Contents结论 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11规格 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11外壳 -Android 平板电脑，铝合金一体成型机身功能 -Galaxy Tab S11 具有可扩展存储空间软件 - 三星平板电脑提供长期更新通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 5GAndroid 平板电脑摄像头 -Galaxy Tab S11 配备自动对焦功能配件和保修 - 带有 Care+ 的三星平板电脑输入设备和操作 -Android 平板电脑内置指纹传感器显示屏：三星平板电脑采用 OLED 面板性能 -Galaxy Tab S11 配备顶级 SoC排放 - 三星平板电脑具有热点功能电池运行时间 -Android 平板电脑的充电速度并不快Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
继去年的 Plus 机型Galaxy Tab S11 的升级。Tab Tab S9 的的继任者仍然是一款 11 英寸平板电脑。与更便宜的型号不同，如 Galaxy Tab S10 Lite或 Tab S10 FE不同，三星没有使用 Exynos 芯片，而是选择了 Dimensity 9400+.
规格 - 三星Galaxy Tab S11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Galaxy Tab S11 Series)ProcessorMediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720Graphics adapterARM Immortalis-G925 MC12Memory12 GB , LPDDR5XDisplay11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB , 104 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC, up to 2TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, position sensor, hall sensor, compass, OTG, MiracastNetworkingWi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 253.8 x 165.3Battery8400 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 16CameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, AF)Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, AF, ultra-wide angle)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo (4 speaker), USB cable, SIM tool, S Pen, One UI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1) | no NavIC | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | optional 5G | IP68 , fanless, waterproofWeight469 g
Price899 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳 -Android 平板电脑，铝合金一体成型机身
Galaxy 灰色和银色 Tab S11Galaxy Tab S11 采用铝制外壳，通过 IP68 认证，防尘防水。它的制造质量非常吸引人，一体式机身设计也体现了较高的质量水平。
与 前代Galaxy Tab S11 变得更薄、更轻。新功能之一是 S Pen 的位置，它通过磁力吸附在边框上，而不是背面。不过，83.6% 的屏占比明显低于 Ultra 机型，这意味着显示屏边框有些厚。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
OnePlus Pad 3 Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Apple iPad Air 11 2025 DIN A4 ❌
功能 -Galaxy Tab S11 具有可扩展存储空间三星为其Galaxy Tab S11 配备了快速 USB 3.2（Gen 1）端口。我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2 固态硬盘）测得的数据传输速度高达 351 MB/s。连接的存储设备可以使用 NTFS（只读）或 exFAT 格式进行格式化。在适配器的帮助下，该端口还可用作外接显示器的图像信号输出端口，而且由于采用了 USB OTG 技术，还可以轻松连接外围设备。
此外，还提供三星 DeX 接口和 Knox Vault 平台（使用专用处理器单元处理敏感数据）。其中一项新功能是 "扩展模式"，用于外接显示器的双屏设置，DeX 可在两个显示器上同时运行，并具有拖放功能。
microSD 读卡器与许多 竞争对手不同Galaxy Tab S11 的存储空间可以通过存储卡进行扩展，容量最高可达 2 TB。结合我们的参考卡 AV PRO V60，我们实现了稳定的传输速度，但是 Galaxy Tab S10 FE的数据吞吐量要高得多。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird V60)
57.4 MB/s +55%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
37.15 MB/s Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=58, last 2 years)
36.2 MB/s -3%
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36 (21.6-45) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (28.6-51.1) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø65.4 (48.4-76.1) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø85.1 (61.1-113.1)
软件 - 三星平板电脑提供长期更新Galaxy Tab S11 已经运行Android 16，其中包括 One UI 8 用户界面。三星在软件中强调其多模态人工智能 "Gemini Live"，允许用户与人工智能助手实时互动。我们熟悉的Galaxy AI 功能，如绘画和写作助手，也在其中。
三星承诺为其平板电脑提供七次重大更新和七年的安全更新。不过，Tab S11 可能会按季度而不是按月接收补丁，这与其前代产品类似。我们的评测设备安装了 2025 年 8 月的安全补丁。
可持续性有关平板电脑可持续性的详细信息，请参阅环境报告和制造商数据表。包装由再生纸制成，框架周围没有薄膜。
通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 5GAndroid 平板电脑虽然 Tab S11 系列中的紧凑型平板电脑只提供 Wi-Fi 6E，而不是现代的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，但它确实使用 6 GHz 频段进行 Wi-Fi 传输。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中，它实现了非常高且相对稳定的传输速率，峰值超过 1,800 Mbps。
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1827 (min: 1785) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1874 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEWi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼40%
Xiaomi Pad 7 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
991 (min: 512) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
895 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1011 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1233) MBit/s ∼79%
OnePlus Pad 3802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
787 (min: 674) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1440 (min: 1058) MBit/s ∼77%
Average Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
941 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1382 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼72%
Average of class Tablet iperf3 transmit AXE11000
567 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
631 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1255 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1469 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1827 (1785-1873) Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1011 (909-1117) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1870 (1677-1911) Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1484 (1233-1554) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø970 (946-1002) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø979 (963-986)
室内无法进行卫星定位
室外地点三星不仅在 5G 版本中安装了 GNSS 模块，而且还在我们的 Wi-Fi 型号中安装了该模块--支持所有常见的卫星系统，尽管只能使用单频连接。
为了测试其准确性，我们在Galaxy 平板电脑上安装了 Garmin Venu 2。Tab S11 可靠地绘制出了我们的路线，但也有一些明显的偏差。
Galaxy Tab S11 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
摄像头 -Galaxy Tab S11 配备自动对焦功能1200 万像素前置摄像头图像再次，Tab Galaxy Tab S9 的继任者配备了 1300 万像素后置摄像头，包括自动对焦和 4K 视频录制选项。作为一款平板电脑，它的拍照效果还算不错，在光线充足的条件下能拍出质量不错的照片，也适合将笔记数字化。除此之外，由于Galaxy Tab S11 的清晰度和动态范围都没有给我们留下深刻印象，因此应该使用智能手机拍照。
1x2x5x8 倍（最大值）
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Subject 1Subject 2Low lightZoom 5xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Xiaomi Pad MiniRealme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Xiaomi Pad MiniRealme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Xiaomi Pad MiniRealme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Xiaomi Pad MiniRealme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
5.1 ∆E6.1 ∆E6.1 ∆E8.7 ∆E8.6 ∆E9.9 ∆E4.6 ∆E6.9 ∆E5 ∆E5.3 ∆E7.5 ∆E6.4 ∆E5 ∆E9.5 ∆E3.6 ∆E7.3 ∆E4.7 ∆E9.6 ∆E9.9 ∆E7.3 ∆E7.2 ∆E10.7 ∆E8.9 ∆E7.1 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: 7.13 ∆E min: 3.61 - max: 10.68 ∆E29.4 ∆E51 ∆E38 ∆E36.3 ∆E42.2 ∆E59.2 ∆E50.1 ∆E32.8 ∆E38.7 ∆E27.1 ∆E62.1 ∆E60.1 ∆E28.4 ∆E47.7 ∆E34.8 ∆E70.1 ∆E39.4 ∆E41.6 ∆E69.1 ∆E66.5 ∆E49.8 ∆E36.6 ∆E23.9 ∆E14 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: 43.71 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 70.12 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
配件和保修 - 带有 Care+ 的三星平板电脑新款三星 S PenGalaxy Tab S11 没有附带电源适配器。除了一根 USB 数据线外，包装盒内只有信息和新的 S Pen。可单独购买配套的 Book Cover Keyboard Slim（建议零售价：145 美元）。
在德国。三星高端平板电脑提供 24 个月的 保修期可选择 Care+ 作为补充。
输入设备和操作 -Android 平板电脑内置指纹传感器Galaxy Tab S11 的触摸屏反应灵敏，能准确转换我们的指尖输入。得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率，操作无比流畅。
S Pen 可通过磁力吸附在边框顶部，无需蓝牙连接即可使用。新功能不仅包括其在平板电脑上的位置，还包括其粗糙的材料表面和棱角分明的设计，让人联想到经典的铅笔。使用触控笔，三星平板电脑可提供愉悦的书写和绘画体验。
你可以用右手拇指轻松访问光学指纹传感器。不过，它的识别率和速度并没有给我们留下特别深刻的印象。二维面部识别也可用于生物识别安全。
显示屏：三星平板电脑采用 OLED 面板子像素排列 三星 11 英寸 OLED 显示屏的峰值亮度为 1,600 cd/m²，像素密度为 274 PPI。令人欣慰的是，我们也成功测量了这一亮度（APL18：1,575 cd/m²，HDR：1,648 cd/m²）。
三星使用脉宽调制来控制显示屏亮度。在整个亮度范围内，OLED 的典型闪烁频率为 480 赫兹。
945cd/m²955cd/m²939cd/m²940cd/m²946cd/m²934cd/m²932cd/m²931cd/m²917cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 955 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 937.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %Center on Battery: 946 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.02CCT: 6322 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11"Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEIPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"Xiaomi Pad 7 ProIPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"Apple iPad Air 11 2025IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"OnePlus Pad 3IPS, 3392x2400, 13.2"Screen8%4%9%7%Brightness middle (cd/m²)946663 -30%776 -18%508 -46%687 -27%Brightness (cd/m²)938617 -34%750 -20%497 -47%641 -32%Brightness Distribution (%)9684 -12%91 -5%93 -3%88 -8%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.390.580.50.58Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.51.47 58%1.6 54%1.13 68%2.03 42%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *5.54.14 25%4.5 18%2.49 55%3.38 39%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.41.4 42%2.5 -4%1.7 29%1.8 25%Gamma2.02 109%2.199 100%2.23 99%2.173 101%2.159 102%CCT6322 103%6730 97%6892 94%6747 96%6727 97%Contrast (:1)1700133810161184* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 HzAmplitude: 15.55 %The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。
我们使用照片光谱仪和 CalMAN 软件进行的色彩还原分析表明，考虑到其价格区间，Tab S11 与 sRGB 色彩空间的 DeltaE 偏差有所增加。遗憾的是，新的 One UI 8 界面在色彩定制方面没有带来任何改进。仍需做出不必要的妥协（配置文件少、白色表现有限等）。
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.758 ms rise↘ 0.735 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.658 ms rise↘ 0.634 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
Galaxy Tab S11 在户外使用非常方便，即使在阳光直射下，显示屏上的内容也清晰可见。在视角稳定性方面也没有发现任何问题，虽然从广角观看时会有轻微的偏红，但这在日常使用中应该不是大问题。
性能 -Galaxy Tab S11 配备顶级 SoCGalaxy Tab S11 通过快速的 Dimensity 9400+处理器。在我们的基准测试中，作为一款 11 英寸的小巧设备，三星平板电脑的表现非常出色。 OnePlus Pad 3采用了 骁龙 8 精英版.
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreOnePlus Pad 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3194 Points +29%Apple iPad Air 11 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
3019 Points +22%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2478 - 2798, n=4)
2665 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2478 Points Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points -20%Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=100, last 2 years)
1430 Points -42%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1367 Points -45% Multi-CoreApple iPad Air 11 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11773 Points +51%OnePlus Pad 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9302 Points +19%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7787 - 9043, n=4)
8306 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7787 Points Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points -34%Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=100, last 2 years)
4589 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
3921 Points -50%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2396591 - 2841845, n=4)
2594211 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2396591 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2045290 Points -15%Average of class Tablet (164396 - 3475590, n=72, last 2 years)
1143696 Points -52%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
894364 Points -63%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
Points -100%BaseMark OS II
OverallSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12637 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11599 - 12637, n=4)
12201 Points -3%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points -30%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
6058 Points -52%Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=65, last 2 years)
5702 Points -55% SystemSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
16271 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (13140 - 16550, n=4)
14964 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10013 Points -38%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points -39%Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=65, last 2 years)
8896 Points -45% MemorySamsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
13578 Points Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points -5%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11248 - 13578, n=4)
12386 Points -9%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
7554 Points -44%Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=65, last 2 years)
6731 Points -50% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
55053 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (54322 - 55810, n=4)
54965 Points 0%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points -55%Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=65, last 2 years)
15252 Points -72%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10293 Points -81% WebAverage Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2152 - 2267, n=4)
2210 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2152 Points Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1730 Points -20%Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=65, last 2 years)
1490 Points -31%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
76843 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (72895 - 76852, n=4)
74932 Points -2%Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=66, last 2 years)
16379 Points -79%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points -81%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10741 Points -86%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1143 - 1233, n=4)
1191 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1143 Points Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=24, last 2 years)
741 Points -35%OnePlus Pad 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
284 Points -75%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
268 Points -77% Half Precision NPU 1.5Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (8659 - 9597, n=4)
9147 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9067 Points Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=24, last 2 years)
3915 Points -57%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
270 Points -97%OnePlus Pad 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
267 Points -97% Quantized NPU 1.5Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11834 - 13099, n=4)
12491 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12422 Points Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=24, last 2 years)
5568 Points -55%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
634 Points -95%OnePlus Pad 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
629 Points -95%AI Benchmark - Score V6
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12632 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1945 - 12713, n=4)
7310 Points -42%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points -71%Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=25, last 2 years)
3433 Points -73%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
300 Points -98%
一个 Immortalis G925 MP12负责图形任务。在 GFXbench 中，Tab S11 取得了不错的成绩，但也低于 OnePlus Pad 3.
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6681 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6388 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5611 Points -12%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points -49%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1488 Points -77%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6679 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5190 Points -18%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points -50%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points -76%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25466 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23674 Points Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points -49%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5184 Points -78%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11833 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11564 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5675 Points -51%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points -55%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11928 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11543 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
8906 Points -23%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points -55%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2491 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2088 Points -16%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points -57%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 Points -73%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2577 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2572 Points 0%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points -57%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
696 Points -73%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
592 fps -25%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps -43%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
153 fps -81%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -41%Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
511 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
450 fps -12%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps -48%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -79%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -52%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
238 fps -34%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps -49%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -77%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -42%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -66%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -69%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
159 fps -10%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -38%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -74%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -32%OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -43%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -66%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps -72%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +19%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
64.2 fps -29%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -41%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -76%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -58%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -61%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -69%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps +12%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
233 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps -11%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps -38%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -77%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +25%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
35.2 fps -12%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -40%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps -76%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
309.456 Points Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
303.591 Points -2%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (130.2 - 365, n=4)
235 Points -24%Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=29, last 2 years)
212 Points -31%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
169.88 Points -45%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
234 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (112 - 235, n=4)
173.8 Points -26%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
138 Points -41%Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=75, last 2 years)
133.5 Points -43%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
92645 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
89374 Points Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points -26%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (36281 - 94555, n=4)
64239 Points -28%OnePlus Pad 3 (Chrome 139)
56667 Points -37%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
50864 Points -43%Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=102, last 2 years)
40662 Points -55%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)
2662 ms * -579%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
790.8 ms * -102%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * -67%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 998, n=4)
598 ms * -52%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
392.3 ms * Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
329.7 ms * +16%* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXiaomi Pad 7 ProOnePlus Pad 3Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-5-10%88%92%-18%-7% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)1694.531602.8 -5%3849.52 127%3796 124%1586 ?(529 - 3134, n=68) -6%1616 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=87, last 2 years) -5% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)1083.121271.5 17%3283.91 203%3329 207%763 ?(233 - 1745, n=68) -30%1183 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=87, last 2 years) 9% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)298.38225.1 -25%302.34 1%316 6%243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=68) -19%233 ?(20.1 - 475, n=87, last 2 years) -22% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)283.45204.2 -28%346.85 22%368 30%241 ?(61.8 - 503, n=68) -15%258 ?(9.1 - 745, n=87, last 2 years) -9%
排放 - 三星平板电脑具有热点功能温度在持续负载情况下，三星平板电脑的外壳会不均匀地发热，并伴有适度的节流现象。3DMark 测试显示，长时间负载时性能下降约为 15%至 40%。
Max. LoadIdle
43.5 °C35.2 °C30.7 °C 47.1 °C37.1 °C31.7 °C 45 °C37.5 °C31.1 °C
Maximum: 47.1 °CAverage: 37.7 °C
32 °C38.6 °C46.8 °C31.7 °C36.3 °C46.7 °C30.5 °C34.8 °C3.7 °C
Maximum: 46.8 °CAverage: 33.5 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
24.9 °C24.6 °C23.2 °C 24.3 °C24.6 °C23.1 °C 23.9 °C23.2 °C24 °C
Maximum: 24.9 °CAverage: 24 °C
23.4 °C24.1 °C24.6 °C23.8 °C24.7 °C24.6 °C22.9 °C24.5 °C23 °C
Maximum: 24.7 °CAverage: 24 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +56%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % +40%OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 % +22%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.3 % Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % +46%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % +35%OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +23%Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
76.4 % +15%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.7 % Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 % +26%Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
81.1 % +7%OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.8 % +5%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEXclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +25%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 % +22%OnePlus Pad 3Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +3%Apple iPad Air 11 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
80 % +1%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.4 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø28.6 (25.8-38.6) OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø34.3 (32.3-39.4) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø88.3 (78.5-124.1) OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø118.7 (106.8-138.7) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø32.2 (28.4-37.4) OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø36.3 (31.6-39.6) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø15.2 (14.3-18) OnePlus Pad 3 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (15.2-18.7)
发言人Galaxy Tab S11 的四个扬声器可提供出色的音质。中音和高音再现线性，低音也很明显。对于一款 11 英寸平板电脑来说，这样的音质非常吸引人。
音频内容可通过 USB-C 端口播放，蓝牙 5.4 可无线使用--尽管音频编解码器的数量相当有限。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池运行时间 -Android 平板电脑的充电速度并不快耗电量8,400 毫安时电池的最大充电功率可达 45 瓦。与 小米 25000 移动电源充电时间约为 1.5 小时。11 英寸平板电脑的功耗可能会更低，尤其是在闲置时，超过 4 瓦的功耗明显高于 小米 Pad 7 Pro.
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.15 / 0.39 WattIdle 2.57 / 4.32 / 4.36 Watt
Load
12.54 / 15.49 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S118400 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE8000 mAhXiaomi Pad 7 Pro8850 mAhApple iPad Air 11 2025 mAhAverage Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ Average of class Tablet Power Consumption39%46%13%12%16%Idle Minimum * (Watt)2.572.1 18%0.75 71%1.6 38%2.21 ?(0.83 - 3.9, n=5) 14%2 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=81, last 2 years) 22%Idle Average * (Watt)4.322.5 42%1.5 65%2.8 35%4.02 ?(1.06 - 6.31, n=5) 7%3.9 ?(1 - 9.2, n=81, last 2 years) 10%Idle Maximum * (Watt)4.362.9 33%1.56 64%4.7 -8%4.17 ?(1.09 - 6.35, n=5) 4%4.24 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=81, last 2 years) 3%Load Average * (Watt)12.545.8 54%7.92 37%11.4 9%10.2 ?(5.93 - 12.5, n=5) 19%9.01 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=75, last 2 years) 28%Load Maximum * (Watt)15.497.9 49%16.5 -7%16.8 -8%13.2 ?(11.1 - 15.8, n=5) 15%13 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=75, last 2 years) 16%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.84 (2.85-15.6) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.63 (2.02-11.9) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.17-3.41) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (10.9-15.3) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.27 (6.81-7.84) Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.2 (3.17-3.41) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)
电池寿命在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，Galaxy Tab S11 明显优于前代产品 前代产品.尽管如此，电池续航时间还是略微令人失望。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 140)
11h 14min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S118400 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE8000 mAhXiaomi Pad 7 Pro8850 mAhApple iPad Air 11 2025 mAhOnePlus Pad 312140 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G8400 mAhBattery runtimeWiFi v1.3 (h)11.214.8 32%17.6 57%11.7 4%23.9 113%9 -20%
Notebookcheck 总体评分Galaxy Tab S11 评测Galaxy Tab S11 是 iPad Air 11 的不错替代品，但这款三星平板电脑也有一些不必要的弱点。
Back to the verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
- 10/02/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard70 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device94%
Connectivity63 / 69 → 91%
Weight84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery89%
Display89%
Games Performance43 / 65 → 65%
Application Performance82 / 92 → 89%
AI Performance77%
Temperature88%
Noise100%
Audio91 / 91 → 100%
Camera66 / 90 → 73%
Average81%
88%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions83.2%Materials65%Packaging95%Power Use91.5%Repairability68%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 83.8%
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.88.2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S11Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘12 GB Memory, 128 GB Amazon: 1. $859.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...2. $799.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 128 G...3. $859.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...List Price: 899€469 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.00"2560x1600274 PPIOLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X
2.81.6%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FESamsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: $534.33List Price: 779€497 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.90"2304x1440249 PPIIPS
3.86.5%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $575.00Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...2. $549.50Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...3. $385.00Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...List Price: 450€500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"3200x2136344 PPIIPS
4.87.4%Apple iPad Air 11 2025Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMeAmazon: $537.00List Price: 699€460 g128 GB NVMe10.86"2360x1640265 PPIIPS
5.88.4%OnePlus Pad 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: $599.99List Price: 699€675 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash13.20"3392x2400315 PPIIPS
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Galaxy Tab S11 Series)News•三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra：值得从Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 换成它吗？ |News•三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra - 更薄、更轻、更智能 |Review•集工作、娱乐和创意于一身的优质平板电脑--三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 评测 |News•三星Galaxy Tab S11 可能令某些用户失望的 4 个原因 |News•为什么说三星Galaxy Tab S11 更适合作为Galaxy Tab S20？ |News•Galaxy Tab S11 系列的新款三星 S Pen 性能卓越，设计颇具争议性 |News•泄露：三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 或与Apple 的 iPad Pro 13 一样薄 |News•三星Galaxy Tab S11、Tab S11 Ultra 和 Tab S10 Lite：全欧元价格、规格和配置泄露
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 163 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 643854 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!